Pitt notebook: RB Graham getting up to speed
• Pitt coach Paul Chryst said running back Ray Graham crossed “a big hurdle,” with 14 carries for 71 yards against Youngstown State. “He trusted himself, and the best thing was his confidence grew in what he was doing.”
• Chryst shouldered part of the blame for Graham's fumble in the first quarter. “We didn't hit him a lot in camp,” Chryst said. “The first (series), he put the ball on the ground. You take some ownership for that.”
• He added there is no pre-set ratio of carries between Graham and backup Isaac Bennett, who had 10 for 42 yards. “Not too hung up on that,” he said.
• Asked about Graham's workload Thursday in Cincinnati, he said: “We'll just kind of see how this week goes. I wouldn't say much more than that, really, because I don't know.”
• Overall, Chryst said the team is approaching good health. One exception might be cornerback K'Waun Williams (shoulder), who played Saturday but didn't finish the game. “He would be the one we are kind of just curious to see how he comes back from it.”
• Chryst said some players don't like uniforms with no names, but he said it represents team unity. “It's one team. It's a clean slate,” he said. “I think it's kind of cool. I know the players, some of them, don't like it. That's all right. We didn't take the names off. We just didn't put them on.” Pitt has had names on the back of its uniforms since Paul Hackett was named coach in 1990.
• Chryst spent the weekend and Monday's practice working on details that went wrong. He said they include ball security, pad level, route depth, consistency in quarterback Tino Sunseri's drops, first steps by the linebackers and leverage by the defensive backs. “That's why you watch film and why you coach and why you drill,” he said.
— Jerry DiPaola
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.