Pitt defensive back out for season
• Pitt freshman defensive back Jahmahl Pardner injured his left knee against Virginia Tech and will have season-ending ACL surgery Friday. Pardner recorded three tackles, with one sack and a forced fumble in the first three games. Because he was injured in the third game, he will accept a medical redshirt and retain four years of eligibility. Pardner joined running back Rushel Shell, tight end J.P. Holtz and defensive tackle Darryl Render as the only first-year freshmen playing this season.
• Senior Andrew Taglianetti, a reserve behind strong safety Jarred Holley, may earn more playing time in passing situations in Pardner's absence.
• Even with senior Hubie Graham nursing a clavicle injury, Pitt's coaches are excited about the increased physicality at tight end, thanks to the development of redshirt sophomore Drew Carswell and Holtz. “(Drew) is starting to take a lot of pride in being physical and trying to bring that element more and more into his game,” said offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph, who added that Holtz impressed coaches with his effort. “J.P. just competed his tail off. He didn't flinch one bit.”
• Rudolph also liked what he saw from Shell, who ran for 157 yards against Virginia Tech to become the first Pitt freshman to rush for more than 100 yards since Dion Lewis in 2009. “(Shell) did a lot of good things and there are a lot of things to kind of clean up, but he showed he can be accountable in his assignments.” Asked about Shell's tendency to run over defenders, Rudolph smiled. “Not bad. He's a physical kid.”
• If senior receiver Mike Shanahan catches five passes against Gardner-Webb, he will move past Steve Moyer (1969-1971) and into 12th place on Pitt's all-time reception list with 118. Shanahan leads the Panthers with 16 catches for 224 yards and a touchdown this season.
— Jerry DiPaola
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.