Pitt: Ethics violation in case vs. ex-coach
A U.S. district judge should bar lawyers for former Pitt football coach Michael Haywood from his federal wrongful firing lawsuit because they've committed an ethical violation, lawyers for the university say in a motion filed Thursday.
One of Haywood's lawyers, Christopher Johns, said the motion is an attempt to sidetrack the case.
Pitt fired Haywood in January 2011, two weeks after it hired him, because he was arrested for domestic abuse. The charges were later dropped.
The university claims Anthony Buzbee, Johns and their Houston law firm violated state ethical guidelines by entering into a contract with Albert Elias, Haywood's agent and a witness in the case, in which Elias will get part of any damage award.
Johns said Elias referred the case and it's common for referring attorneys to get a referral fee if the plaintiff wins.
There's nothing unethical in the firm's agreement with him, Johns said. Pitt officials declined comment.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status
- Pitt players support Rudolph for job
- Pitt survives Oakland’s upset bid with overtime victory
- Analysis: Misunderstood Chryst served Pitt well
- Starkey: Pederson had to go at Pitt
- Chryst returns home, named football coach at Wisconsin
- Pitt’s acting athletic director is deft facilitator
- Pederson’s 2nd tenure as Pitt AD comes to abrupt end
- Position move fits Pitt sophomore Artis
- Many Pitt fans endorse move to oust Pederson as athletic director
- Assistant at Duke eyes Pitt football job