Pitt notebook: Graham continues to gain confidence
Pitt running back Ray Graham (1) runs down along the stands as he high-fives fans after Pitt defeated Gardner-Webb on Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, in Pittsburgh. AP Photo/Keith Srakocic
Photo by AP
• Pitt coach Paul Chryst said running back Ray Graham is not fully recovered from knee surgery, despite his rise to third in the Big East in rushing. “A full-speed Ray will be a pretty good thing,” Chryst said. If he's not 100 percent, where is he? Chryst said he doesn't know, and isn't interested in knowing. “Each week, Ray is gaining in confidence,” Chryst said. “It's not to the point where we are taking any steps backward, so I'm not trying to figure it out. I like being around Ray and appreciate the way he works, and I think the only thing we spend a lot of time talking about is being your best. As (the knee) keeps coming back, that will help him get better.”
• Rutgers' Jawan Jamison leads the conference with an average of 122.7 yards, followed by Cincinnati's George Winn (121 in two games) and Graham (90.5). Pitt freshman Rushel Shell is No. 6 (76.3 in three games).
• Chryst said a point of emphasis will be attempting to eliminate penalties. Pitt is 87th among 120 schools with an average of 7.5 per game (30 for a loss of 279 yards). Three Big East teams are worse: Syracuse and South Florida are 110th (8.75). and undefeated Rutgers is 119th (10.25).
• Pitt has amassed 1,163 yards of total offense in the past two weeks (626 vs. Gardner-Webb and 537 vs. Virginia Tech), a school record for back-to-back games. The prior mark was 1,154 set in 1992, a 3-9 season, when Pitt recorded 558 yards vs. Rutgers and 596 against Minnesota. The three-game record also was set in ‘92 (1,706 against Rutgers, Minnesota and Maryland).
• Pitt senior wide receiver Mike Shanahan was named to the Big East honor roll after catching five passes for 144 yards and two touchdowns against Gardner-Webb.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.