Pitt basketball notebook: Moore expects Panthers to score more in transition
• Athleticism, versatility and depth could allow Pitt coach Jamie Dixon to experiment with different lineup combinations before the regular season. Junior forwardJ.J. Moore is convinced that will allow Pitt to score more in transition. “We're faster than we've ever been, and it's a good thing for us because we want to get up and run,” Moore said after Sunday's intrasquad scrimmage at Petersen Events Center. Moore can play both forward positions, and the 6-foot-6, 215-pounder said he has added weight to make him more of a viable option at the four-spot. Moore averaged 7.5 points last season, but he scored in double figures in nine of Pitt's final 13 games.
• Dixon said the scrimmage didn't provide much of a gauge for him because it didn't allow him to try enough combinations. “A lot of it depends on who you're with, and some guys make other guys better,” Dixon said. “(Guard JamesRobinson) seems to be a guy that does that, and that's what we've seen. I thought about going an extra eight minutes, but this was the right amount of time for us.”
• Point guard Trey Woodall logged a game-high 32 minutes, and Dixon was pleased with how the fifth-year senior handled the workload. “He played a lot of minutes, more than I wanted him to play, but he's been able to do that in practice,” Dixon said. “I'm happy with his conditioning, his effort, his approach. It's something to build off.”
• Dixon seems excited about Pitt's prospects at center, where senior Dante Taylor will team with freshman Steven Adams and sometimes alongside him. “Dante's been scoring a lot in practice, so we think between the two of them we can get some interior scoring,” Dixon said.
— Scott Brown
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.