Pitt notebook: Senior tight end Graham progressing from injuries
• Senior tight end Hubie Graham, who has been battling shoulder and ankle injuries most of the season, might play Saturday against Temple. “He did a little work today and is kind of coming a little bit,” offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph said. “We'll see how (Tuesday) affected him for (Wednesday).”
• While Graham, his No. 1 backup Drew Carswell and fullback Mark Giubilato were out with injuries, wide receiver Mike Shanahan performed some blocking duties in the manner of a tight end. “He blocked a lot like we would use those guys,” Rudolph said. “He did a nice job with it. That's something he brings to the table and can add into some of the blocking schemes. You ask him, and he champions whatever role you give him and does a nice job of it.”
• Shanahan, who has 128 career receptions, needs six to move into fifth place on Pitt's all-time list.
• Rudolph said the wind at Buffalo on Saturday played a part in holding the pass attempts by quarterback Tino Sunseri to a season-low 17. “You wanted to be smart when it was a little bit harder to throw it down the field,” he said. “I had confidence in Tino but also didn't want to put anyone in a bad spot in that situation.”
• Dan Mason is in line to make his second consecutive start at middle linebacker for Shane Gordon, who has a high ankle sprain. Injuries to that part of the ankle typically take longer to heal than other sprains.
• Students attending the game will receive pink pompoms as part of Pitt football's first Breast Cancer Awareness game. Prior to the game, at 9:30 a.m., Pitt will hold a pink tailgate for survivors and their families at Stage AE, adjacent to Heinz Field. Also, the team will run onto the field through a lineup of survivors.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.