Pitt football notebook: Tight ends neglected in passing game
• Pitt has drifted away from using tight ends as pass catchers, with senior Hubie Graham, redshirt sophomore Drew Carswell and freshman J.P. Holtz combining for a total of only 13 catches for 145 yards. Carswell scored the only touchdown Sept. 6 at Cincinnati. Offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph said it has more to do with tight ends helping in pass protection than a lack of confidence in their receiving skills. “I don't think it's anything you're going out of your way to do or feel like guys are limited ability-wise,” he said. “I just think you are trying to do what you are good at right now.”
• Graham said several people have commented that Holtz reminds them of a young Graham. “I feel like that is a compliment,” Graham said, “because J.P. is a tough kid.”
• Safety Jason Hendricks has turf toe and is walking with his right foot in a boot, but he said he will play Saturday.
• Since he rushed for 157 yards against Virginia Tech on Sept. 15, Rushel Shell has scored three touchdowns in four games, but he has gained more than 41 yards only once in that time. He continues to work on his pass blocking. “It's coming,” Rudolph said. “He's working at it. That will come with time. There are a couple things we have to clean up.”
• Senior kicker Kevin Harper has missed five field-goal attempts this season, four at Heinz Field. But he's looking forward to the final two home games of his career — Saturday against Temple and Nov. 24 against Rutgers. “It's a great challenge. The turf can get beat up,” he said. “If I show people I can do it there, I can do it anywhere.” Harper, who has graduated and will finish his MBA next summer, hopes to get a shot at the NFL. “If not, go into the real world,” he said. He also will consider the medical sales and investment banking fields.
— Jerry DiPaola
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.