ShareThis Page

Pitt makes position clear: More scoring, better rebounding

| Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012, 10:48 p.m.
Pitt's Lamar Patterson during the CBI Championship at Petersen Events Center March 2012.
Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
Pitt's Lamar Patterson during the CBI Championship at Petersen Events Center March 2012. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review

Pitt juniors Lamar Patterson and J.J. Moore should spend a lot more time this season playing together rather than passing each other on the way to bench.

Coach Jamie Dixon is committed to getting two of his top returning scorers — who both play small forward — on the floor simultaneously during the 2012-13 season.

Patterson (6-foot-5, 221 pounds), the team's co-MVP last season, will return at small forward, where he started 37 games last season. Moore (6-6, 215), named the Panthers' most improved player, will man power forward when the Panthers go with a smaller lineup.

“That's probably the way of doing it,” Dixon said during Pitt media day last month. “You've got to get your best players on the floor. It's something you are going to see a lot more, for obvious reasons.”

The departure of three-year starter Nasir Robinson leaves 6-9, 230-pound junior Talib Zanna as the' only returning power forward for the Panthers, who open the season at 6 p.m. Friday against Mount St. Mary's at Petersen Events Center.

The small forward spot, meanwhile, is crowded with Patterson, Moore, sophomore Cam Wright and 6-6 redshirt freshman Durand Johnson.

Patterson (9.6 ppg, 5.3 rpg) and Moore (7.5 ppg, 2.9 rpg) almost exclusively played small forward last season. They were at their best in the final month of the season. Patterson averaged 12.3 points, 5.5 rebounds and 4.4 assists in the final 10 games. Moore averaged 11.8 points in the final 13 games.

They were on the floor together for a combined 10 minutes and 46 seconds in the two exhibitions, including the final 4:03 of last week's Hawaii-Hilo game.

“It's been working out well so far,” Moore said at media day. “It spaces it out and gets guys open. I'm trying to screen better and rebound better for the team.”

The power forward in Dixon's system needs to be able to rebound and pass and be somewhat of a perimeter threat. Moore, arguably the team's best athlete, made at least one 3-pointer in each of the final 13 games last season, shooting 42 percent from behind the arc during that span. But he averaged only 2.9 rebounds per game, and managed only two rebounds in 78 minutes in the three-game CBI finals against Washington State.

If Moore plays power forward, Pitt will need strong rebounding from its centers — senior Dante Taylor and five-star freshman Steven Adams. After having surgery in April for a broken fifth metatarsal on his right foot, Moore devoted time to upper-body work.

Patterson led the Panthers in 3-point shooting percentage (41.0), steals (38) and assist-to-turnover ratio (2.11) last season.

A Lancaster native who attended national power St. Benedict's (N.J.) as a senior, Patterson is embracing his new leadership role.

“I knew it was coming,” he said. “A lot of guys look at me as an example, and if I'm not doing the right thing, they aren't going to do the right thing.”

John Grupp is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.