Pitt football notebook: Pair of juniors plan to return next season
• Pitt juniors Devin Street and Aaron Donald are among the top players in the Big East at their respective positions, but both said Monday they are not thinking about leaving school early for the NFL Draft. “Yeah, definitely,” said Street when asked if he plans to return for his senior season in 2013. “I think I'll be back next year. But I'm just focused on Rutgers (Saturday's opponent) and finishing these two games off for these seniors and get them to a bowl game.” Donald, who anchors the defensive line at tackle, said he is similarly focused, and he has not thought about the future. Street is having his best season at wide receiver, with 59 receptions for 806 yards and four touchdowns. His catches- and yards-per-game averages (5.9 and 80.6) are second in the conference. Donald is fourth in the Big East with 11 1⁄2 tackles for a loss.
• Street also said he been selling the program to visiting recruits, and they are listening, he said. “I am excited to see what coach Paul Chryst is going to do with the program.”
• Chryst said he is not worried about playing at Heinz Field on Saturday, hours after the last of four WPIAL championship games Friday. “What do you want us to do about it?” he said. “Let's go play. No, there are a lot more concerns that I've got than that.”
• Freshman running back Rushel Shell has seven carries for 25 yards in the past two games after averaging 14 for 70 in the previous three. Chryst said there is no reason for that other than circumstance. “We hope to get them both a good share of carries,” he said of Shell and Ray Graham.
• Chryst said he has not ruled out any injured players from playing Saturday, including tight end Hubie Graham, who didn't practice last week and has battled shoulder and ankle pain most of the season.
— Jerry DiPaola
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.