ShareThis Page

Pitt football coach Chryst preaches the benefits of bowl game

Jerry DiPaola
| Monday, Nov. 26, 2012, 9:10 p.m.
Pitt coach Paul Chryst urges on his team against Rutgers on Saturday, Nov. 24, 2012, at Heinz Field. (Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review)
Pitt coach Paul Chryst urges on his team against Rutgers on Saturday, Nov. 24, 2012, at Heinz Field. (Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review)

There is nothing unique about a college team going to a bowl game.

Seventy schools — more than half of those in the FBS — earn invitations to the 35 games scheduled between Dec. 15 and Jan. 7.

Nonetheless, coach Paul Chryst would treat a bowl bid as one of the crowning accomplishments of his first season at Pitt.

“You only go to a bowl game if you achieve a certain level,” Chryst said. “That's certainly a goal.”

In Pitt's case, that would mean beating South Florida on Saturday night and reaching a .500 record in the regular season (6-6) for the second consecutive season.

That likely would lead to the school's fifth bowl berth in a row, either the Pinstripe, BBVA Compass, Liberty or Beef ‘O' Brady's.

“There absolutely is value to it,” Chryst said. “The benefits to the program and the rewards to the players are huge.”

The tangible benefits to the players — other than the gift bags and free meals offered by bowl officials at the site — would be license to practice 15 more times.

Senior guard Chris Jacobson, who has gone to a bowl game in all but his freshman season with the Panthers in 2007, said the experience would be good for younger players who didn't get a lot of practice time during the regular season.

“We really got after it, the younger guys, and the older guys got a break,” he said, recalling previous pre-bowl practices. “It's kind of rough, actually. I feel bad for the younger guys,” he said, laughing.

Of course, Pitt will go nowhere this postseason if it can't defeat South Florida (3-8, 1-5) on Saturday night in Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fla.

Chryst said he doesn't expect the Panthers to take the Bulls lightly, even though they have lost eight of their past nine games.

“Shame on us if we don't have the right attitude,” Chryst said. “It also means to me you haven't watched much tape. You throw on the film and you see talented players.

“That would be a big mistake not respecting any opponent, and especially this one.”

Chryst said he has heard players talk about their desire to go to a bowl.

“I'm glad they are talking that way,” he said. “We have to make sure their actions (this week in practice and against South Florida) show that.”

Beyond this week, preparations for this year's bowl game likely would be more intense and more meaningful than they were a year ago when Pitt prepared for its second consecutive Compass Bowl after coach Todd Graham's sudden resignation.

In fact, this appears like it would be Pitt's first bowl since 2009 that an interim coach won't be in charge of the proceedings. Pitt went to the Compass Bowl in 2010 after Dave Wannstedt had been fired.

Asked what would be one of the benefits of going to a bowl game, Chryst said: “Selfishly, to be around these guys for one more game.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can reached at or 412-320-7997.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.