Pitt coach Paul Chryst reached out to his prize recruit Wednesday, and quarterback Tra'von Chapman wasn't shy about getting right to the point.
“I asked him if he would be my coach, and he said he would,” said Chapman, a senior at Theodore Roosevelt High School in Kent, Ohio. “He said he would shoot me straight. He decided he's here (at Pitt) to stay.”
Chryst, who met with his current players before calling Chapman, has been linked to the head coaching vacancy at Wisconsin since Tuesday when Bret Bielema was hired by Arkansas. Chryst was Bielema's offensive coordinator from 2005-11.
“All the speculation sounds false to me,” Chapman said.
Chapman, a four-star prospect who threw for 5,736 yards in two seasons at Roosevelt, is set to enroll at Pitt next month.
“He made it pretty clear to me he is a Panther,” Chapman said. “He said he is excited for the second year (at Pitt) and getting the freshmen on campus.”
Earlier, Chryst met briefly with his players to tell them he had not been contacted by Wisconsin. Chryst did not address the possibility of replacing Bielema, but he read the statement issued by the school Tuesday in which he affirmed his commitment to Pitt.
“Business as usual,” safety Andrew Taglianetti said.
Chryst, who has a $6 million buyout clause in his contract, is scheduled to travel to Birmingham, Ala., on Thursday to attend functions related to the BBVA Compass Bowl.
Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez will coach the Badgers in the Rose Bowl, ESPN reported.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-320-7997.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.