Atlantic Coast Conference presidents pledge their unity
The presidents of 15 ACC schools, including Pitt chancellor Mark Nordenberg and Notre Dame's Fr. John Jenkins, issued a statement Thursday, asserting their commitment to the conference in the face of the shifting landscape of college athletics.
The statement comes in the wake of Maryland announcing plans to leave the ACC for the Big Ten in 2014 and reports of other ACC schools possibly planning similar moves.
Big East members Pitt and Syracuse are joining the ACC next year and Louisville will join in 2014 to keep conference football membership at 14. Notre Dame will join no later than 2015 in all sports, except football and hockey, but the Irish will play five football games a year against ACC schools.
Here is the presidents' statement:
“We, the undersigned presidents of the Atlantic Coast Conference, wish to express our commitment to preserve and protect the future of our outstanding league. We want to be clear that the speculation about ACC schools in negotiations or considering alternatives to the ACC are totally false. The presidents of the ACC are united in our commitment to a strong and enduring conference. The ACC has long been a leader in intercollegiate athletics, both academically and athletically, and the constitution of our existing and future member schools will maintain the ACC's position as one of the nation's premier conferences.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pitt offense eyes healthy balance
- All signs positive for Pitt junior forward Johnson
- Notre Dame leads powerhouses in ACC; Pitt women picked 14th
- Discipline Pitt’s only option against Georgia Tech
- Pitt’s defense has not rested in post-Donald era
- Pitt notebook: Chryst didn’t lobby to keep Watt at tight end
- Starkey: No harm putting Pitt’s Conner on defense