Share This Page

Pitt football notebook: Guard Doakes suspended for bowl game

| Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 8:20 p.m.

• Pitt redshirt sophomore Arthur Doakes, who started the final four games of the regular season at right guard, was suspended for at least one game for violating team policy, a university spokesman said Wednesday. Doakes won't play in the BBVA Compass Bowl on Saturday against Ole Miss, but coach Paul Chryst hasn't named a replacement. Redshirt sophomore Shane Johnson, who never has started a game in three seasons at Pitt, is listed behind Doakes on the team's two-man depth chart. Doakes, 6-foot-6, 340 pounds, had replaced regular starting right guard Ryan Schlieper, who suffered a season-ending ankle injury Oct. 27 against Temple. Doakes is the second Pitt offensive lineman suspended this season. Redshirt junior Juantez Hollins was suspended for the season before the start of training camp.

• Senior quarterbackTino Sunseri, whose 39-game consecutive start streak is the most since Alex Van Pelt's 46 from 1989-92, said he doesn't know what type of legacy he will leave behind. “It's whatever people make of it,” he said. “I have no control over that. The only thing I'm trying to do is win another bowl game.” If he throws for 193 yards against Ole Miss — 66 below his per-game average this season — he will passDan Marino (8,597) for second on Pitt's all-time passing list. He needs only 8 yards to pass Tyler Palko (8,429) for second place in total offense.

• Chryst won't name an interim defensive coordinator for the game, but he will have assistants Chris Haering, Matt House and Inoke Breckterfield share the duties of former coordinator Dave Huxtable, who resigned last month to accept the same job at N.C. State.

— Jerry DiPaola

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.