ShareThis Page

Pitt basketball notebook: Lineup change backfires for Panthers

Kevin Gorman
| Saturday, Jan. 5, 2013, 4:44 p.m.

PISCATAWAY, N.J. — Pitt coach Jamie Dixon tinkered with the starting lineup, only to see the move backfire when Rutgers made a corresponding tweak to its backcourt.

Dixon replaced freshman James Robinson with redshirt sophomore Cameron Wright. The intention, Dixon said, was to use Wright as a defensive stopper against Carter and to spread out Robinson's minutes.

One problem: Carter didn't start for Rutgers.

The Scarlet Knights were leading, 15-5, by the time Carter was inserted into the game at 14:57 of the first half. By then, the Panthers already had made a mass substitution that included Robinson, who defended Carter anyway.

Wright finished scoreless and picked up four personal fouls in 15 minutes. Robinson had four points, one rebound, five assists and two turnovers in 25 minutes.

“Cam has been playing better in practice,” said Dixon, who said the move was made for a “variety” of reasons. “We've got to find a way. We've got to get the right group. I know it's there. I believe we can be the team we want to be, but you can't dig a hole like this.”

Rice said the plan wasn't for Carter, who entered the game as the Scarlet Knights' leading scorer at 17.1 points, to come off the bench, but “Eli helped me out with some violations of team rules, nothing serious.”

Rice might consider bringing Carter off the bench more, considering he scored a game-high 23 points in 31 minutes.

“I'm going to have to look at it more because he does add a scoring punch and Jerome (Seagears) gave us defensive toughness on the floor,” Rice said. “I really wish I could say we thought hard about it and studied it and crunched the numbers, but no, it was just a minor rule violation.”

Tale of two halves

The back-to-back losses to Cincinnati and Rutgers to start Big East play left Pitt trying to figure out how to piece together a complete game.

“I definitely think we're going to turn it around. It's right there. We've got to stick it out both halves,” senior center Dante Taylor said. “We always come out one half and do not so great in the next half, and the next half we do good.”

The Panthers jumped out to a 34-26 halftime lead in a 70-61 loss to Cincinnati Dec. 31 at Petersen Events Center. The reverse was true for Rutgers, which held a 39-25 halftime advantage. Pitt outscored Rutgers, 37-28, in the second half.

“We responded in the second half. We played better,” Dixon said. “It's hard to come back from a 15-point deficit, but we got it down pretty quick. … I guess when you put yourself in a hole you have very little margin for error.”

Double dribbles

Redshirt freshman Durand Johnson scored eight points off the bench, although six came on buzzer beaters. He banked in a 3-pointer from the top of the key to beat the shot clock with 4:23 remaining in the second half, then drained a long 3 just before the final horn sounded. … Instead of returning to campus, Pitt will spend three days in Washington, D.C., to prepare for its game against Georgetown at 9 p.m. Tuesday at Verizon Center. … Taylor did not travel to Washington with the Panthers, instead going to attend funeral services for his grandfather. Taylor is expected to return in time to play against Georgetown.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.