Pitt football notebook: Boyd commitment adds another playmaker from WPIAL
• Clairton wide receiver Tyler Boyd's decision to make a verbal commitment to Pitt during the U.S. Army All-American Bowl gives the Panthers two of the top four players from the WPIAL, including Belle Vernon offensive lineman Dorian Johnson. The other two players — Central Valley wide receiver Robert Foster and North Allegheny offensive lineman Patrick Kugler — have committed to Alabama and Michigan. Although the commitments are not binding until letter-of-intent day Feb. 6, Boyd's announcement gives Pitt an edge on procuring the offensive play-maker it so desperately needs.
• Pitt's total of 22 commitments, including seven from the WPIAL or City League and two from Class A PIAA champion Clairton, could grow to 29 in the next month. Boyd, of course, has said he hopes to visit Michigan State and Tennessee this month. He is joined in Pitt's tentative Class of 2013 by Clairton teammate Titus Howard. Pitt also has offered a scholarship to Clairton's Terrish Webb, a star of the Bears' postseason run.
• The Panthers did lose a prospect they were hoping would commit to them when Jaleel Hytchye, a cornerback from Cincinnati's La Salle High School, said Saturday he will enroll at Kentucky.
• The loss to Ole Miss was Pitt's most lopsided defeat since losing to Cincinnati, 34-10, on Sept. 6.
• Nearly unnoticed in the Pitt loss was the play of wide receiver Devin Street, who caught seven passes for 83 yards and a touchdown. Street tied a Compass Bowl record, held by five others.
• Pitt is 12-17 all-time in bowl games, including 2-3 during its current five-game postseason streak.
— Jerry DiPaola
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.