Pitt's Woodall says he's 'ready to go'
Pitt fifth-year senior point guard Tray Woodall said he's healthy enough to play in the Panthers' game against Villanova on Wednesday.
Photo by Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
After missing the majority of the Marquette game with a concussion, Pitt point guard Tray Woodall pronounced himself fit to play at Villanova on Wednesday.
“I'm 100 percent,” Woodall said. “I'm fine. Ready to go.”
The fifth-year senior was injured at 16:30 of the first half when he collided head-first with Golden Eagles guard Derrick Wilson. Woodall said he felt better by the 8:00 mark, but doctors ruled him out for the remainder of the 75-67 overtime loss at Petersen Events Center.
Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said the Panthers followed university protocol for concussions. It required Woodall to be symptom-free for 24 hours, then allowed him to do running and conditioning at Monday's practice and wait another 24 hours before participate in contact drills.
“It's all pretty uniform,” Dixon said. “We know what to expect. I knew when he went down, even though he said he wanted to play and that he could play, I figured the policy is in place that he was going to be out.”
Woodall is expected to participate in a full-contact practice Tuesday, after which his playing status will be officially determined for the Villanova game.
“If the doctors feel he can't play, even though he says he can, then he can't play,” Dixon said. “It's as simple as that. As you know, we err on the side of caution. We're at the forefront of concussion testing.”
— Kevin Gorman
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.