ShareThis Page

Pitt notebook: Rebounding keys blowout win

Jerry DiPaola
| Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, 8:56 p.m.
Pitt's Dante Taylor pulls down a rebound over DePaul's Derrell Robertson at Petersen Events Center Jan. 26, 2013.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Dante Taylor pulls down a rebound over DePaul's Derrell Robertson at Petersen Events Center Jan. 26, 2013. Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review

When DePaul coach Oliver Purnell looked onto the court Saturday during his game against Pitt at Petersen Events Center, he saw familiar faces.

The players he sees every day ran, jumped, guarded and shot (although not well).

But at times, Purnell had to wonder how much of a challenge his team offered the Panthers, who recorded a historically easy 93-55 victory in front of 12,512.

“Literally, once (Pitt) got going, they were shooting until they made it,” he said.

Purnell was referring to the first half when DePaul's biggest players — 6-foot-9 Donnavan Kirk and Peter Ryckbosch and 6-10 Derrell Robertston — had no defensive rebounds.

Pitt coach Jamie Dixon preaches rebounding and often complains that he doesn't get enough of it from his team.

But the Panthers were dominant on the boards from start to finish, getting 58 rebounds (20 offensive) to DePaul's 34.

Pitt's rebounding total was a season high — beating the previous high of 49 against Duquesne on Dec. 5 — and well above its average of 34.6 entering the game.

“You got bad offense and you got crushed on the boards,” Purnell said, summing up his team's fifth loss in six Big East games this season.

Strong bench

Dixon said the strength of his team is its bench, and it showed against DePaul.

The five players who didn't start — Cam Wright, Durand Johnson, Dante Taylor, Trey Zeigler and J.J. Moore — almost outscored the entire DePaul team (52-55). The Panthers' reserves did outscore Pitt's starters, 52-41.

That's the second time that has happened this season in the Big East, the first occurring at Villanova on Jan. 16 when Pitt's backups had a 31-27 advantage over their starting teammates.

Everyone has a hand

Long before the end of the game in the second half, all 10 players had at least one point, rebound and assist.

“The coaching staff has faith in everyone,” said Wright, who came off the bench to score eight points after playing only five minutes in the past three games.

Wright's stat line was impressive because it included everything. Besides points, he had four rebounds, two assists, two steals and one blocked shot.

“As players, as teammates, as brothers, we have faith in each other,” Wright said.

Zeigler leads the way

Zeigler didn't start, but he led in Pitt in scoring with 18 points, the sixth different player this season to achieve that distinction.

“We kept coming at them with our unselfishness,” Dixon said.

Pitt totaled 23 assists, the most in a Big East game this season.

Too many mistakes

Despite the easy victory, Pitt committed a season-high 18 turnovers.

“We had too many,” Dixon said. “You are going to have more against the way DePaul plays (up-tempo). We have to be able to play through the press and attack on the backside.

“We did a good job, but too many (turnovers) and some were unforced.”

The others

The only players who didn't get in the game were Chris Jones and Aron Nwankwo, who are redshirting, and Mike Lecak, who must sit out the season after transferring from Wheeling Jesuit.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.