Pitt grabs linebacker for 26th recruit
Pitt coach Paul Chryst's visit to his native Wisconsin paid a dividend Wednesday: Oconomowoc High School linebacker Zach Poker became the 26th player to verbally commit to the Panthers.
The 6-foot-4, 230-pound Poker had offers from Air Force, Army, Syracuse, Central Michigan and Western Michigan, but he chose Pitt after he visited last weekend.
“It's a great combination of athletics, education and players and coaches,” said Poker, who wants to major in mechanical engineering.
Pitt recruited Poker — a two-star recruit, according to Rivals.com — to be an outside linebacker, but he also has a talent for catching the football. He caught 50 passes for 753 yards and eight touchdowns last season. He has played tight end, fullback and receiver.
“We'll see where my body takes me,” he said.
Poker is the second linebacker in Pitt's Class of 2013, joining Matt Galambos of Havertown. Poker committed with little fanfare.
“He did not hold a news conference,” Oconomowoc coach Ryan McMillen said. “Coach (Chryst) was excited; (Zach) was excited. He committed and went back to class.”
Pitt receiver prospect Jester Weah of Madison (Wis.) Memorial will announce his college choice Friday, his coach, Mike Galindo, said.
Pitt offered Weah, a three-star recruit, a scholarship last weekend during his visit. Weah also is considering Colorado State, Wyoming, Ohio and Bowling Green, among others.Weah would give Pitt depth at a position where it is losing seniors Mike Shanahan and Cam Saddler.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.