Pitt zeroing in on junior forward Zanna for lift
When Pitt started Big East play, Talib Zanna was leading the Panthers in scoring and being touted as a candidate for the conference's Most Improved Player award.
Zanna dropped 20 points twice and had double digits in nine of the first 13 games, but the 6-foot-9 redshirt junior power forward has scored in double figures twice against nine Big East opponents — and none in the past six games.
“It's the Big East, so the intensity is going to improve,” Zanna said. “I've just got to be patient and let the game come to me. Sometimes, I try to rush some shots. I've got to take my time and make plays and make my teammates better. I just want to bring what the coach wants me to bring to the table.
“There's no pressure on me.”
The decline in Zanna's statistics has been something of a head scratcher given that the Panthers consider him one of their hardest workers and most aggressive players despite the dip in production.
“I think it's mental with him,” redshirt junior swingman Lamar Patterson said. “He'll be fine. That's a player I don't worry about. He works very hard. He's just got to get it back going.”
If Zanna can reverse his fortunes, he could be a key for Pitt (17-5, 5-4) in solving the signature zone defense of No. 6 Syracuse (18-2, 6-1), which visits Petersen Events Center at noon Saturday.
“He's very important. He's capable of knocking down that mid-range jump shot,” Patterson said. “To beat the zone, we've got to be able to get it inside and get in the middle of it. He's our big that's going to be able to do it.”
Not only has Zanna gone from Pitt's leading scorer in nonconference games to its No. 3 scorer in Big East play, but also his field-goal and free-throw percentages are down, and his rebounding has declined.
“It was something that we didn't take for granted,” coach Jamie Dixon said. “We were excited about it and recognizing it as a strength. Obviously they haven't been as high in recent days, but we've won a lot of games during that stretch, too. It shows up more when you don't get a win, and that's what happened Monday.”
Zanna's problems have come closer to the basket, where he had trouble finishing in the 64-61 loss at Louisville. His first two touches resulted in shots blocked by 6-11 center Gorgui Dieng; on his third try, Zanna scored a reverse layup.
Dixon has preached patience and balance to Zanna.
“I expect him to be active and aggressive and be back to scoring baskets for us at the percentage he was,” Dixon said. “He was shooting a high percentage and finishing at such a high rate that you wonder if it's going to continue all the way through. There are going to be some games where he doesn't measure up to those numbers, but his effort has been tremendous.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.