Pitt turns focus to Seton Hall
By Kevin Gorman
Published: Sunday, Feb. 3, 2013, 7:18 p.m.
Moments after Pitt's signature win of the season, one that should resonate with the NCAA Tournament selection committee, Jamie Dixon congratulated his Panthers.
Then he told them to get ready for Seton Hall.
The Pitt coach knows that only a week ago, the Panthers followed their most dominant performance of the season with one of their sloppiest. Two days after the 38-point victory over DePaul, they lost by three at Louisville.
Don't blame Dixon for worrying about how Pitt (18-5, 6-4) will perform with another two-day turnaround when it plays Seton Hall (13-9, 2-7) at 9 p.m. Monday in a Big East game at Petersen Events Center.
“We'll see,” Dixon said. “I didn't think we played up to our standards (last) Monday. We have that same thing. It's unique we have had so many of these quick turnarounds like this. But we have to be ready. We have to focus on Seton Hall.”
Where the 65-55 victory over No. 6 Syracuse marked Pitt's fifth victory in the past six games, Seton Hall is enduring a losing stretch. It has lost seven of its past eight games, including a 65-59 home loss to Cincinnati on Saturday.
“We've got to continue to build off this win,” Lamar Patterson said, dismissing the short break. “It's not that difficult. We'll definitely have our legs ready to go by Monday.”
Pitt has the advantage of playing back-to-back games at he Pete, where the Panthers are 11-2 this season and benefit from the vocal Oakland Zoo student section.
Pitt has won the rebounding battle in five of its past six games — it was even at Providence — and Dixon stressed that it must continue against a Seton Hall team led by the frontcourt of 6-foot-6 swingman Fuquan Edwin (16.6 points, 6.0 rebounds), 290-pound center Gene Teague (12.0, 7.7) and 6-9 forward Brandon Mobley (9.4, 5.6).
The Panthers can't look past the Pirates, even if they know their most difficult three-game stretch of the season awaits: They visit Cincinnati Saturday and Marquette on Feb. 16 before hosting Notre Dame on Feb. 18.
“It's not like it gets easier,” Dixon said. “I think every game is a must-win. That's the kind of standard we've developed here and play with.
“We were extremely disappointed with how we played against Louisville. We didn't get it done with a three-point game on the road against a good team. You've got to finish off and get it done here (Saturday), and we did. We were down after that game because we didn't feel we played well — or up to our standards.”
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.