Dixon: Golden Eagles' experience an advantage
MILWAUKEE — Jamie Dixon doesn't know exactly why Marquette has Pitt's number this season, sweeping the Big East season series by beating the Panthers at their own game.
But he does have an interesting explanation.
Dixon went down the Golden Eagles' roster, noting the frontcourt includes fifth-year senior center Chris Otule, redshirt junior Jamil Wilson and backup junior center Davante Gardner. That trio combined for 31 points and 15 rebounds.
Dixon noted guard Vander Blue, who scored a game-high 19 points and had six rebounds, is a junior. And swingman Trent Lockett, who had 11 points, is a senior who transferred from Arizona State. They play in the backcourt with Junior Cadougan, another senior.
“I think they've got a good team. They're well-coached. They've got depth. They're older,” Dixon said. “They've done what we did for awhile there: stay old.”
Going too small?
Dixon dwelled on losing the battle of the boards, a point of emphasis all season. The Panthers led the Big East in rebounding margin (plus-4.8) but were outrebounded for the second consecutive game.
Marquette finished with 33-24 edge, including 18-10 by halftime. It didn't help that the Golden Eagles also shot 56.5 percent from the field (26 of 46) and 75.9 percent on free throws (22 of 29).
“We've got to outrebound people,” Dixon said. “They shot 61 percent, didn't miss any free throws (in the first half). As the game went on, they continued to get to the free-throw line. ... Maybe we thought we could get one done without doing the things we do well.”
Senior point guard Tray Woodall blamed a rotation that saw 6-foot-6 backup J.J. Moore log more minutes (23) than 6-9 starter Talib Zanna (17) at power forward. Moore finished with one rebound, while Zanna had four.
“I think we went too small at times,” Woodall said. “We were smaller, having J.J. at the ‘four.' Talib, who is our four-man, played about 17 minutes. He's a rebounding machine. He's one of the guys we're rebounding with.”
Dixon draws a ‘T'
Dixon was asked what he said to referee Tim Clougherty, whose ear he was chirping in all game, to draw a technical foul with 6:05 remaining and the Panthers trailing, 63-50.
“That was my first one in I don't know how long,” Dixon said. “I congratulated him on that. I hadn't had one this year. It was no bad language, you can be sure. Pass that along to my mom.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.