Pitt basketball notebook: Adams sits out first game of year
• Freshman center Steven Adams missed his first game of the season Sunday with a left ankle injury, but Pitt coach Jamie Dixon was cautiously optimistic about his return Saturday at DePaul. “I anticipate him being ready next week,” Dixon said before catching himself and amending that assessment. “That's a week away. It's an ankle, so we'll see. I'll let him speak for that. It's probably not my job to do that.” Adams injured the ankle in practice Saturday and left on crutches. But he dressed, warmed up with teammates and sat on the bench throughout the 73-64 overtime victory against Villanova. “I know he was hungry and anxious to get out there,” Dixon said.
• Adams leads the team in rebounds with an average of 6.2 per game, but Talib Zanna had a career-high 19 against Villanova — seven off the offensive glass — to lift his average to 6.1.
• Pitt stretched its winning streak to six against Villanova — every game since the Wildcats beat Pitt in an NCAA Elite Eight game in 2009. That was the only time in the past eight years that Villanova defeated Pitt twice in the same season. “To beat Pitt twice, you have to be a Final Four team,” said Villanova coach Jay Wright, whose team is winless in six games at the Petersen Events Center. “With their toughness and physical play, we can judge where we are when we play them, even when Ben (Howland) was here,” he said.
• Pitt's last Big East game at the Pete inspired Dixon to talk about what the conference has meant to his program. “You wonder how it can get any better than this, playing in the best conference in the country,” he said. “We wouldn't be the program we are now unless we were part of the Big East. That was our selling point 14 years ago when we came here. If you want to play against the best, come to Pitt.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.