Junior guard Zeigler transferring from Pitt
After a year that saw him go from star scorer at Central Michigan to seldom-used substitute at Pitt, Trey Zeigler is transferring again.
Dissatisfied with his reserve role after averaging 4.4 points, 2.0 rebounds and 15.8 minutes in 31 games, the 6-foot-5 junior guard plans to sit out a season and play at another Division I program.
“It was a tough season to deal with,” he said. “After the season, I reflected on it with my family, and I felt if I would go somewhere I could play more, I would be more productive.”
Zeigler averaged 16 points a game in scoring 1,011 points over two seasons at Central Michigan before transferring after his father, Ernie, was fired as Chippewas head coach.
He received an NCAA waiver and was eligible to play immediately for the Panthers but was suspended for two games following a November arrest for driving under the influence and never found his niche in Pitt's 10-man rotation. Zeigler scored in double figures three times, including a team-high 13 at Villanova on Jan. 16 and a season-high 18 points against DePaul on Jan. 26.
“We will assist Trey in finding the best situation for him to reach his goal both academically and athletically,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said in a statement. “He's a great kid, hard worker and good player. We thank Trey for his contribution to our program over the last year and wish him much success in the future.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.