The long-term reconstruction of the Pitt offensive line continued Monday when Connor Hayes of Traverse City, Mich., said he will enroll next year.
Hayes, a 6-foot-4, 300-pound guard, is the only recruit in Pitt's Class of 2014 after Blackhawk quarterback Chandler Kincade decommitted last month.
Hayes is rated as a three-star recruit by Rivals.com, and he chose Pitt over offers from Duke, Indiana, Syracuse, Bowling Green, Central Michigan, Western Michigan and Toledo.
He said Pitt was the best fit for him.
“They have a power offense, and they are looking for tough, hard-working guys who play to the whistle,” he said. “I feel that's me.”
Pitt coach Paul Chryst hopes Hayes will add depth to future lines, something it has been without the past two seasons. Of the 15 offensive linemen expected to be on the roster this summer, three are seniors and only one of those is a starter.
“(Hayes is) the most physical player I have ever coached,” Traverse City West coach Tim Wooer said. “He will fit in perfectly into everything Pittsburgh wants to do.
“If you look up the definition of the word mauler in the dictionary, you would probably find a picture of Connor. He is a physical, nasty kid. He is going to try to embarrass you.”
A three-year starter, Hayes was one of only four freshmen to play on the Traverse City varsity team during the past 20 years, Wooer said.
Traverse City plays in the largest classification in Michigan. “And (Hayes) will be better than anybody we see,” the coach said.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.