Pitt dismisses two from football team, suspends prized QB recruit
Pitt football coach Paul Chryst dismissed two players Tuesday and suspended another in connection with two unrelated incidents last week.
Junior tight end Drew Carswell, 21, and junior safety Eric Williams, 20, are no longer with the team. Police charged them by summons with prohibited acts during a drug bust Thursday in Oakland.
Freshman quarterback Tra'von Chapman faces a pretrial hearing May 28 in Portage County, Ohio, on misdemeanor assault and unlawful restraint charges, according to court records.
Kent police say Chapman, 18, pulled the hair of a female and grabbed her around the neck Friday night, “leaving marks,” a criminal complaint states.
Chapman pleaded not guilty Tuesday at an arraignment in municipal court in Kent. His father, Thad Jemison, posted $1,150 bond, and Tra'von Chapman was released. A condition of his bond is that he have no contact with the alleged victim.
Chapman, the prized recruit in Pitt's Class of 2013, graduated early from Theodore Roosevelt High School in Kent in December and enrolled at Pitt in January. He participated in spring drills.
Carswell and Williams were expected to play key roles this season.
Carswell, Williams and junior defensive tackle K.K. Mosley-Smith, 21, were in a Juliet Street home police raided. Police also charged Mosley-Smith with prohibited acts. He remains on the team but has been suspended.
Chryst had no comment Tuesday, a Pitt spokesman said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.