Report: Ex-Schenley star to commit to Pitt
Schenley graduate DeAndre Kane, who is transferring from Marshall, plans to commit to Pitt while visiting this weekend, CBS Sports reported Wednesday.
The arrival of the 6-foot-4 Kane, who averaged 15.1 points and seven assists a game as a junior for the Thundering Herd, would give the Panthers a much-needed boost at shooting guard after the graduation of top scorer Tray Woodall and the transfer of Trey Zeigler.
CBS Sports reported Kane needs to pass two classes to graduate from Marshall and become eligible to play immediately at Pitt next season. He has one season of eligibility remaining.
The Panthers have added four other players to their 2013 recruiting class: Mike Young, a power forward from McKeesport who played at St. Benedict Prep in Newark; Josh Newkirk, a shooting guard from Word of God Christian in Raleigh; Jamel Artis, a point forward from Baltimore who played at Notre Dame Prep in Fitchburg, Mass.; and Joseph Uchebo, a center from Chipola Junior College in Florida.
Kane played on Schenley's 2007 PIAA Class AAAA champions alongside former Pitt star DeJuan Blair and former St. John's star D.J. Kennedy. Kane was a member of three consecutive City League champions for the Spartans, averaging 33 points a game as a senior.
After a season at Patterson School in Lenoir, N.C., Kane committed to Seton Hall before signing with former Pitt assistant Tom Herrion at Marshall.
Kane sat out his freshman season as an academic casualty, then averaged at least 15 points a game the past three seasons — with a high of 16.5 as a sophomore — and was a two-time All-Conference USA second-team selection. He shot only 24.8 percent from 3-point range and 52.1 percent on free throws this past season but scored in double figures in 20 of 28 games, with seven games of 20 points or more and a season-high 33 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists against Hofstra.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.