Pitt's Chryst embraces St. Anthony mission
The relationship between Pitt football coaches and St. Anthony School dates to the 1970s and '80s, when Johnny Majors and Jackie Sherrill invited students to practice.
Paul Chryst went a step further: He came to the students.
Chryst was keynote speaker Thursday at the Spirit of St. Anthony breakfast at Omni William Penn Hotel, Downtown.
His message in a 10-minute speech to about 150 St. Anthony supporters likened the school's mission to what he is trying to build at Pitt.
“Football is the vehicle that we get to use (at Pitt), but it's all about helping people grow,” he said. “Growing as a student, growing as an athlete, growing as a person. Football isn't life or death, but it is important because of a group of people trying to do something.”
St. Anthony, founded in 1920 as an orphanage in Oakmont, serves developmentally impaired students ages 5-21. It has branches in White Oak, Glenshaw, Bethel Park, Munhall, Crafton and McKeesport and at Duquesne University.
Chryst said meeting young St. Anthony students Sammie Schulz and Charlie Osborn at the breakfast was similar to when recruits visit campus and he gets to put a name with a face.
“Thanks for making St. Anthony real to me,” he told the students.
Chryst did not speak specifically about his football team, which opens training camp in early August. But when asked about choosing a starting quarterback, he smiled and said he didn't want to say anything in front of a reporter seated at his table.
He did promise, however, “We'll have one.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.