Pitt gets commits from QB, local RB
Pitt received verbal commitments Tuesday from quarterback Adam Bertke, a two-time state champion at Marion Local (Ohio) High School, and Shady Side Academy running back Dennis Briggs, doubling its number of recruits from the Class of 2014.
Bertke, 6-foot-6, 210 pounds, threw for 2,300 yards and 16 touchdowns and ran for 1,000 and 20 scores last season at Marion, which plays in the smallest division in Ohio.
Bertke, who will be a three-year starter this season, visited Pitt on Tuesday and committed. He said he also has offers from Illinois, Kent State, Akron and Toledo.
The 5-foot-11, 195-pound Briggs ran for 473 yards on 82 carries last season at Shady Side. He also has offers from Cornell, Yale, Buffalo and Toledo, but he chose Pitt to have an opportunity to play big-time college football, he said.
“I feel those coaches are genuine about me and honest about me,” he said. “They said they thought I had leadership qualities.” Shady Side coach Dave Havern, a former Pitt quarterback, said Briggs offers qualities that go beyond the football field.
“There are better football players around, but no better kids around (than Briggs) that are good football players,” he said. “And I'd take a polygraph on that. Paul Chryst is getting the kind of kid he needs to get.”
Pitt has promises from four recruits, including offensive lineman Connor Hayes of Traverse City, Mich., and defensive back Jalen Williams of Newburgh, N.Y.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.