2 defensive tackles, linebacker commit to Pitt
Pitt received three more commitments Thursday from the Class of 2014 when Fox Chapel linebacker Quintin Wirginis, defensive tackle Mike Herndon of Staunton, Va., and defensive tackle Connor Dintino of Wallingford, Conn., told coaches they will enroll next year.
The 6-foot-4, 320-pound Herndon chose Pitt over Virginia Tech, which impressed his coach, Robert Casto, of Riverheads High.
“Choosing Pitt is pretty good in the state of Virginia, where most young men go to Virginia Tech,” Casto said.
Herndon, rated a three-star prospect by Rivals.com, starts at middle linebacker for Riverheads, but Casto doesn't expect the transition to be a problem.
“He plays middle linebacker, but he may be a stand-up nose guard or a defensive end or defensive tackle for us,” Casto said. “We move him around.”
Herndon, who is the Panthers' biggest defensive recruit, also had offers from Connecticut, James Madison, Old Dominion and Western Michigan.
Wirginis (6-2, 225) turned down a Temple offer to commit to Pitt. He plays outside linebacker, but Pitt coaches are planning to use him in the middle.
“I don't think it will be a problem,” Wirginis said.
Wirginis said he knows he has a lot of work to do but is confident he can handle it.
“I've been to a bunch of camps, and I've seen kids stronger than me and faster than me who are better football players, but I think I can be better than them,” he said.
Dintino, of Choate Rosemary Hall, is a three-star recruit and had offers from Buffalo, UConn, Holy Cross and Villanova.
Pitt has collected nine commitments from rising high school seniors in the past week, bringing the total to 10.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.