Shell inquires about returning to Pitt
Running back Rushel Shell has reached out to Pitt officials about returning to school after asking for a release from his scholarship three months ago, a source close to the situation told the Tribune-Review.
Also, the Los Angeles Times, citing another unidentified source, reported Sunday that Shell has decided not to transfer to UCLA, where he had said he wanted to go after leaving Pitt, to remain close to his 16-month-old twin daughters, Arionna and Amiyah.
It was not known whether Pitt would allow Shell to return.
Shell was not available for comment Sunday night. A Pitt spokesman had no comment.
Shell, who was targeted to be Pitt's featured running back this fall, stopped going to practice after the sixth session of the spring and told coach Paul Chryst he wanted to transfer. He said in April that he planned to transfer to UCLA. He visited the campus and attended the Bruins' spring practice.
Pitt officials granted him permission to transfer but blocked him from going to Arizona or Arizona State because of the presence there of former Pitt coaches. He also was blocked from attending ACC schools.
Shell set a Pennsylvania high school record, rushing for 9.078 yards while at Hopewell before joining the Panthers for his freshman season in 2012. He played 12 games — after a one-game suspension for the opener — and finished second in rushing with 641 yards and four touchdowns. He made his only start in the BBVA Compass Bowl in place of injured starter Ray Graham.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.