ShareThis Page

DiPaola: Pitt football team turns page, ready for fresh start

| Monday, Aug. 5, 2013, 10:54 p.m.
Pitt coach Paul Chryst claps during the Panthers' spring game Friday, April 12, 2013.

When the practice horn shatters the morning silence along the Monongahela River on Tuesday, Pitt hopes to leave behind a period of instability, defeat and — worst of all — irrelevancy.

Finally, Pitt football matters again, thanks to its far-thinking administrators who discovered a new home in the ACC and had the good fortune to find Paul Chryst still available after botching two previous coaching hires.

The page is turning on a sorry chapter, and it's about time. Call it the cleansing of a program that isn't dirty but needed to throw out some litter.

There were 22 players who entered last season with more than one year of eligibility who are no longer with the team.

Some of the missing are part of the normal attrition inherent to college football — players who weren't good enough and should never have been recruited by previous coaches.

Others were forced out by injury, or acted like fools in public and wasted a valuable opportunity.

Chryst could have kept some of the departed but not at the expense of his principles. He knew they could have helped, but he said no anyway. Good for him.

Pitt needs more than talented players. It needs athletes who can push beyond the limits of their abilities on the field and act like adults off it. There were some of those on the past two teams — just not enough. That's how you finish 6-7.

Meanwhile, the football product may suffer while Chryst continues rebuilding. Gone from the 2012 team are the two most productive running backs, five of the top seven pass catchers and three starting offensive linemen. When some left before exhausting their eligibility, no coach lost any sleep.

Chryst signed 27 freshmen this year for a reason: He wants to change the culture.

Here is analysis of at least one player from each position who didn't play last year but could contribute in 2013:


Chryst will choose either senior Tom Savage or redshirt freshman Chad Voytik as his starter. Savage hasn't thrown a pass in a college game since 2010; Voytik's next pass will be his first.

Running back

Freshman James Conner was stout enough to be ranked the nation's 26th-best weakside defensive end by and fast enough to be a Class AAAA all-state runner at Erie McDowell last season.

Wide receiver

No pressure, but freshman Tyler Boyd may need to grow up fast and take some pressure off senior Devin Street — unless someone emerges from a group of little-used veterans.

Offensive line

No one will be surprised if freshman right tackle Dorian Johnson unseats redshirt junior T.J. Clemmings, who played defensive end his first three years at Pitt.

Tight end

Manasseh Garner, a Brashear graduate and transfer from Wisconsin, has the speed to stretch a defense on a solid 6-foot-2, 230-pound frame.

Defensive line

Freshmen Shakir Soto and Tyrique Jarrett, who enrolled in January, will provide depth at end and tackle.


Woodland Hills graduate Mike Caprara redshirted as a freshman and won't start, but he showed toughness and good instincts in the middle during spring drills. Wolverines coach George Novak taught him well.


A nice group of veteran starters must stay healthy, but redshirt freshman cornerback Trenton Coles has some interesting athletic talents.


Freshman Chris Blewitt, an all-state selection from Virginia, could win the job.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.