ShareThis Page

Savage named Pitt's starting quarterback

| Wednesday, Aug. 14, 2013, 2:12 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt quarterback Tom Savage throws as Chad Voytik watches on the first day of practice Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013, on the South Side.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt quarterbacks Tom Savage (left) and Chad Voytik chat during spring practice March 7.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
PItt quarterback Tom Savage throws during practice Tuesday, August 6, 2013, in the South Side.

Tom Savage all but shrugged his shoulders when coach Paul Chryst walked into a meeting room before practice Wednesday and named him Pitt's starting quarterback.

“I was excited, but I'd be a fool to take it anymore than that, especially with what happened to me in the past,” he said.

Five years ago, Savage was Rutgers' starting quarterback as a freshman before getting hurt and losing the job the next season. That's when he transferred to Arizona and, finally, to Pitt last year in a final attempt to resurrect a once-promising career.

“I can't become complacent,” he said. “It's a privilege, but I have to keep working, and I have a lot of room to improve.”

Savage, a 23-year-old fifth-year senior, beat out redshirt freshman and 2012 prized recruit Chad Voytik.

Coach Paul Chryst said his decision had more to do with Savage's progress and skill than anything Voytik, 19, failed to do.

“I feel really good and confident in Tom and really like the direction Chad is going,” Chryst said. “Right now, (Savage) gives us the best chance for our team to win.”

No matter who plays quarterback, Pitt's passing game will undergo a major change this season with new personnel — freshman wide receiver Tyler Boyd is starting to put his hands around a starting job — and a quarterback who can throw the ball deep with accuracy.

“He's certainly talented,” Chryst said of Savage, who is 6-foot-5, 230 pounds.

The next sign of progress would be for Savage to get comfortable with his receivers.

“Not just with the receivers, but just his own timing,” Chryst said. “Maybe he's sure, but he's not sure if the guy is sure. We have to work through those (situations).”

Savage hasn't played since 2010 — and, then, only four starts — after throwing for Big East freshman records in yardage (2,211) and touchdowns (14) in 2009.

“I am anxious to get out there, but I don't want to wish away time,” he said. “I want to have this opportunity to become better as a team and improve.”

Part of that process involves becoming familiar with Boyd and senior wide receiver Devin Street.

Boyd appears to be ahead of the older wide receivers in the unsettled battle for a starting job.

“I love the progress he's been making,” Chryst said. “I think he has done a great job of learning. He wants to be coached.”

Offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph said Boyd is developing a comfort level after a demanding week of practice.

“You can see it in the speed he's playing at,” Rudolph said.

Asked about his confidence level, Boyd put it at “7 12 to 8” on a scale of 1-10. He said it was 6 12 last week.

Savage called Boyd “a phenomenal player.”

“Every time, (coaches) say first team, I'm in there,” Boyd said. “I'm not saying I'm a starter yet. I'm going to keep working.”

Boyd credits Street with reducing his learning curve.

“I try to see everything he's doing,” Boyd said. “He keeps asking me, ‘You good? You good?'

“If he keeps leading, I'm going to keep following.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.