Pitt soccer prepares for rigors of ACC
After going 4-30-3 in Big East games the past four years, it's hard to imagine things getting much tougher for the Pitt men's soccer team.
But they might.
The Panthers are joining the ACC, the conference that has produced four of the past six national champions and is at least on par with the Big East.
“I don't think it'll be a big change,” 30th-year coach Joe Luxbacher said. “I have heard the ACC is a bit more technical. They're very direct, very physical, have good athleticism. But good soccer players are good soccer players.”
Luxbacher said he thinks he added more good players in the offseason, finding a mix of transfers and freshmen to complement 15 returners.
Among notable newcomers are freshman forward/midfielder Romeo Charron, a member of the Swiss Under-18 national team, and senior forward/midfielder Chris Davis, a transfer from Gardner-Webb who was second-team All-Big South as a sophomore.
“Athletically, we should be good,” Luxbacher said. “(Our) skill level has gone up. In all respects, potentially we're a better team than we were a year ago.”
Pitt went 6-9-2 last season but 0-8 in the Big East. The Panthers' first taste of the ACC comes Sept. 6, when they visit N.C. State.
The jump to the ACC is more daunting for the Pitt women, who went 7-10-2 last season and 2-6-2 in the Big East.
The new ACC includes the queen of women's soccer, 22-time national champion North Carolina, along with 2010 national champion Notre Dame and five other preseason top-25 teams.
Pitt's ACC opener is Sept. 12 against Boston College.
— Jeff Vella
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.