Pitt notebook: RB Conner shaken up at practice
• The Pitt running back situation appeared to take a turn from bad to worse Thursday when freshman James Conner landed awkwardly on his left shoulder after chasing down safetyJason Hendricks, who had intercepted a pass. Conner yelled in pain and trainer Rob Blanc immediately tended to him, strapping an ice pack to the shoulder. He did not practice for the rest of the day. There was no update from coach Paul Chryst, but Conner tweeted shortly after practice, “Shoulder is good!” Conner had been the first running back on the field since starterIsaac Bennett injured his right knee Aug. 10. Bennett worked without a leg brace for the second consecutive day, but he did not participate in the scrimmage portion of practice.
• Outside linebacker Todd Thomas, who plays on the weak side, continues to make plays in practice, but he remains the backup to starter Anthony Gonzalez. Unhappy over his demotion, Thomas left the team Aug. 7 and missed most of the first week of practice. He remained a backup when he returned last week, but he has caught Chryst's attention. “He has been tremendous, his approach,” the coach said. “He's good, he's working, he's competing.” Thomas tipped away a pass near the goal line during the scrimmage and also was a force in the run defense. To move to the first team, Thomas needs to unseat Gonzalez or strong-side linebacker Bam Bradley. If coaches decide to start Thomas, Gonzalez could move to the strong side.
• Chryst gave defensive tackle Aaron Donald most of the day off, a common practice this summer to help keep Pitt's top players fresh. Wide receiverEd Tinker and kicker Chris Blewitt were wearing boots during practice.
• Pitt will hold its annual Fan Fest from 1 to 3 p.m. Sunday at Heinz Field, where people can meet and get autographs from players and coaches.
— Jerry DiPaola
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.