Pitt notebook: Much-traveled Savage thought about quitting sport
A year ago, Pitt quarterback Tom Savage was so unsure about where his football career was headed that he briefly thought about quitting.
“Believe it or not, last year during camp, I was a walk-on, just coming back (after transferring for the second time),” he said. “I was pretty down then, thought about hanging it up a little bit and just moving on with my life.”
But Savage, ineligible to play in games after transferring, fought through his feelings, received support from his parents, went to practice every day and now he finds himself getting ready to play defending ACC champion Florida State on Monday night on ESPN.
“I'm lucky to be out here playing,” he said. “Not too many kids get to transfer twice and start their career off again against Florida State. People would die to have that opportunity.”
• Florida State coachJimbo Fisher said the Seminoles were among several teams that tried to recruit Savage in 2009 when he was a senior at Cardinal O'Hara High School. “I was close to setting up a visit (to Florida State), but I kind of pulled the trigger pretty fast for Rutgers,” Savage said.
• Running backIsaac Bennett is recovering from his knee injury, but there is still no definite word on his status for Monday. “He's coming along,” offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph said. “We'll kind of see where he's at. He's doing a little bit more each day, which is encouraging. ... We will see where that goes as the week progresses.”
• Rudolph said freshman wide receiver Tyler Boyd earned a starting job after only three weeks of training camp by proving to coaches that he is reliable. “He didn't miss anything, fought his tail off, probably hit the wall at some point and battled through that,” he said. Rudolph said the playbook will not be trimmed to accommodate Boyd's inexperience. “He is taking on the full responsibility of the position.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.