Panthers eye what future holds as they apply lessons learned
Two consecutive losing seasons, two blowout losses in the same minor bowl game and a nationally televised thumping by Florida State have taught Pitt football players an important lesson.
Pay no attention to the past.
That's the theme Pitt will carry forward when it returns to Heinz Field at 12:30 p.m. Saturday to play its first nonconference game of the season against New Mexico (1-1).
“Coaches stress it's a new beginning, a new team,” said tight end Manasseh Garner, who scored his team's only touchdown Sept. 2 in a 41-13 ACC loss to No. 10 Florida State.
Garner, a Brashear graduate who transferred from Wisconsin, is one of several first-year Pitt players who weren't around for the past two seasons of mediocrity.
“We make our own destiny,” he said. “It starts now.”
From the outset of spring drills, coach Paul Chryst has been dipping liberally into the two-deep depth chart in hopes of finding better players, especially on defense. After all, Florida State averaged 8.5 yards per play against Pitt's veterans.
“We have to tackle better, challenge receivers and finish our (pass-rush) pressures,” said Chryst, who used 11 freshmen and seven redshirt freshmen. “It's our job, my job to make sure we learn from the Florida State game. You enjoy that part of it, the growing part.”
A four-touchdown loss underscores problems on both sides of the football, and Chryst knows the ground game also needs work.
Running backs Isaac Bennett and James Conner totaled 69 yards on only 18 carries. The results were difficult down-and-distance situations and only two of eight third-down conversions.
“We weren't very good on first down,” Chryst said. “If you can stay ahead of the chains, that helps. We were bad on third down. If you convert more than 25 percent of your third downs, you get more kicks at the can.”
Junior guard Matt Rotheram said an offensive line that has three first-year starters has more potential than he has seen in his four seasons at Pitt. He said it was hidden by the bright lights of a highly anticipated ACC debut.
“In our first game, some guys weren't used to the crowd, not used to the atmosphere,” he said. “(The action) seems faster in the game than in actual practice. That's tough for young guys.
“It's good to play good competition right off the bat. Guys make their first start. This is what they know, what they have to expect now and they move on from there.”
The danger is experiencing a letdown against New Mexico of the Mountain West Conference after playing the Seminoles, one of the best teams in the nation.
“We don't want Florida State to beat us twice,” Rotheram said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.