ShareThis Page

Pitt freshmen waste no time in getting involved

Jerry DiPaola
| Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, 11:28 p.m.
Pitt receiver Tyler Boyd beats New Mexico's Cranston Jones for a 51-yard catch during the first quarter Saturday, Sept. 14, 2013, at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt receiver Tyler Boyd beats New Mexico's Cranston Jones for a 51-yard catch during the first quarter Saturday, Sept. 14, 2013, at Heinz Field.

Children grow up quickly these days, and no one knows that better than Pitt coach Paul Chryst.

“I know with my kids, they're a lot more advanced in many ways than I ever was,” said the father of three. “But maybe they get that from their mom.”

Chryst's other family, especially those who comprise his team's freshman class, seem to be aging well.

Twelve freshmen from the Class of 2013 and seven redshirt freshmen have played in the first two games, meaning:

• Chryst wants to win now.

• The older players on the roster need help.

• The freshmen are among the best, if not the best, players at their positions.

“It depends on a lot of variables,” he said, “like who's here already and who are the freshmen. It's your job as a coach to make sure that your best players can play.”

The best playmakers for Pitt have been freshmen.

Tyler Boyd, named Monday as ACC Receiver of the Week and 247Sports National True Freshman of the Week, is averaging 20.3 yards per touch (receptions, kickoff returns and runs). He also stands 16th in the nation and third in the ACC in all-purpose yards (173 per game).

Running back James Conner leads Pitt in rushing (153 yards on 21 carries, 7.3-yard average). Kicker Chris Blewitt, who won the job the minute he arrived on campus, has been perfect on extra-point kicks (eight) and field goals (two). Backup safety Terrish Webb, who was Boyd's teammate at Clairton, has the team's only fumble recovery.

Pitt entered this season needing help at all of those positions.

“I'm glad right now we have a group that can help us,” Chryst said.

Until 1972, when there were no NCAA scholarship limitations, freshmen were ineligible to play. Now, with each school allowed 85 football scholarships, each player is more valuable.

Duke coach David Cutcliffe, whose team plays Pitt on Saturday, said rosters used to total more than 200.

“You could have separate freshman practices,” he said. “You can't do that with 85.”

But he admits it's difficult for freshmen to contribute.

“Most of them aren't immediately ready, let's face it,” Cutcliffe said.

Even while playing 12 freshmen, Chryst plans to redshirt more than half of his class (15 of 27).

Sophomore center Artie Rowell, one of five starting linemen who previously redshirted, said mental stress can be tough for freshmen to overcome.

“I wake up. I have this class, go here, go there,” he said. “If you put a lot of energy into that type of stuff and not necessarily just focus on football, it can be taxing.”

Chryst said he knows several good high school coaches who have helped young players with the transition.

“So maybe what freshmen are learning and what they can bring to the table is more advanced,” he said.

Boyd, who has superior athletic ability and a willingness to work, said the game is easier than he expected.

“It's only been two games, but I thought it was going to be way tougher,” he said. “I'm not saying it's really easy, like high school, but I just give all the credit to all the work I put in through the summer and all the help the coaches gave me and all the players helping me succeed.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.