Pitt still learning Matt House's defense
If you think Pitt goes through head coaches at a maddening pace — three in the past four seasons — take a look at the recent list of defensive coordinators: Matt House is the fourth in as many years, having replaced one-and-done defensive boss Dave Huxtable, who was hired in 2012 after the coaching shuffle of 2011 sent Keith Patterson looking for a new job. In 2010, Phil Bennett ended his three-year term as former coach Dave Wannstedt's coordinator.
House's defense — seasoned and seemingly sure of itself coming into the season — allowed 532 yards in a 58-55 victory at Duke last week. But four interceptions, two of which led to Pitt touchdowns, eased the pain.
“Thank God, we didn't give up 59,” House said.
House, 35, seems to be a better fit for coach Paul Chryst's staff than the abrasive Huxtable, who was told to seek employment elsewhere at the end of last season and now runs the North Carolina State defense. House is not nearly as loud in practice, although he spends so much time connecting with his players that his voice is perpetually hoarse. Also, unlike Huxtable, House didn't sleep in his office during training camp.
The transition has been perilous, with Pitt last in the ACC in touchdowns allowed (16) and total defense (445). The latter number ranks 102nd among 123 FBS schools.
“The kids are still growing,” House said. “Anytime you give up that many points, you come back and take a hard look. There were some things that put us in a position to be sweating in the fourth quarter.”
Senior strong safety Jason Hendricks, one of eight returning starters on defense, said differences emerged this year.
“He wants different things,” Hendricks said. “Not me, per se, but linebackers have different jobs, different fits, the language is a little different. Guys are working hard to get better at it.”
What did work well was Hendricks' video study that led to his interception, one of Pitt's four against Duke.
“He made a great play,” House said. “We actualy had a blitz on, and we (changed the play) to coverage.”
House has retained the 4-3 alignment, although he said uses more 3-4 on third down.
“There is little bit of carryover, not much,” junior free safety Ray Vinopal said. “It's pretty much a lot of new stuff. There is a lot less man-to-man. There are more zones, which is actually a good thing. Instead of chasing guys all over the field, the idea is you pass it (the receiver) to the guy closer to you.
“It can take time to develop the feel of your teammates and how everyone plays to make that happen efficiently, but I think it's a good deal.”
Vinopal said he had “bad eyes” on one of Duke quarterback Brandon Connette's four touchdown passes, but he tries not to concern himself with criticism from outside sources.
“I can't tell people what to think,” he said. “I certainly can't go out there and explain to everyone who wants to hop on Twitter what we are doing in this coverage and that coverage and where I am in this coverage.
“I can't concern myself with the opinions of people who don't actually know what we're running, whether or not they know football or not.
“The talent is there. The scheme is there. We can do it. We have to keep our focus a little better.”
NOTES: Wide receiver Tyler Boyd said he sprained his ankle Monday and sat out practice Wednesday, but he expects to play Saturday against Virginia. “It's a minor sprain,” he said. “I should be up and running (Thursday).” ... Sophomore defensive end Devin Cook suffered an ACL knee injury in the Duke game and is lost for the season.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.