Pitt notebook: Freshmen again prove impressive when it counts
On a day when several Pitt players looked out of sorts and out of sync, leave it to the freshmen to preserve the 14-3 victory against Virginia.
Pitt improved to 3-1 while freshmen Tyler Boyd, James Conner, Matt Galambos and Rachid Ibrahim were among the most important contributors.
“I really like how a lot of young guys are playing early,” said Galambos, a freshman from The Haverford School near Philadelphia. “We are going to be dangerous pretty soon.”
Galambos made his first career start in place of senior linebacker Shane Gordon, who missed the game with a rib injury.
Ibrahim, a freshman running back from Rockville, Md., came off the bench to replace Conner and junior Isaac Bennett. He had three carries for 23 yards on Pitt's last series of the game that started on its 3 while the Panthers were protecting their lead.
The 6-foot-1, 185-pound Ibrahim finished with 26 yards on four carries, 1 yard less than Conner, who led the Panthers with 27 on 15 carries.
“I think Rachid is the player of the game in my eyes,” Conner said. “When his name was called, he made the most of it. Rachid is the whole package. Once he gets more weight on his bones, he will be the real deal.”
Galambos and Ibrahim had played lesser roles earlier this season, and Galambos said Pitt coaches told him as early as the first days of training camp to be ready to contribute.
“They told me in the beginning, ‘You are going to help this team, whether it's special teams or different packages,'” Galambos said. “I said I was going to try to make some kind of impact.”
Pitt has used 12 freshmen and seven redshirt freshmen.
Conner had special inspiration for the game, with Jason and Sarah O'Neill, parents of his friend and former Erie McDowell High School classmate Alyssa O'Neill, in attendance at Heinz Field.
Alyssa died Sept. 4 after an epileptic seizure.
“Alyssa was watching over me,” he said. “It was an awesome feeling. I'm glad (the O'Neills) had good seats.”
The O'Neills also met Pitt coach Paul Chryst after the game.
Pitt defensive tackle Aaron Donald and outside linebacker Todd Thomas continued their streak of making big plays.
Donald had two of Pitt's three sacks of Virginia quarterback David Watford, giving him 24 1⁄2 for his four-year career. That's good for seventh place on the school's all-time list, ahead of Brandon Lindsey (22 1⁄2), Dennis Atiyeh (23) and Bryan Knight (23 1⁄2). Donald is one-half behind Pro Football Hall of Famer Chris Doleman, who had 25 between 1981-1984.
Thomas recorded a fourth-down stop for the third consecutive week, chasing down Virginia running back Kevin Parks for no gain on fourth-and-2 in the second quarter. Thomas also stopped fake-punt attempts against New Mexico and Duke.
“Communication was on point, and everybody was making plays,” Donald said. “We were a lot more comfortable. We just had fun today.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.