ShareThis Page

Pitt's shaky, inexperienced offensive line continues to be a work in progress

Jerry DiPaola
| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 4:46 p.m.
PItt sophomore offensive lineman Dorian Johnson is expected to work with the starters when spring practice begins..
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
PItt sophomore offensive lineman Dorian Johnson is expected to work with the starters when spring practice begins..

Jim Hueber can take the heat.

He has directed the efforts of offensive linemen from Dodge City, Kan., to Madison, Wis., to Pittsburgh in a coaching career that has spanned five decades. He served on a staff with the Steelers' Mike Tomlin during his five years with the Minnesota Vikings.

So when Hueber met reporters this week after Pitt allowed 15 combined sacks to Virginia and Virginia Tech, he knew what was on their minds.

“All right,” he said before the first question. “Where are we going? As if I didn't know.”

Hueber usually enjoys lively football banter, but he is serious about the problems facing his line.“I get it. I've been doing this a long time,” he said. “If it's the sacks, it's the line. I don't have any problem with that.”

Hueber is working to make short-term corrections, but he knows it's a long-term fix to get the line playing at a level that allows Pitt to build a consistent passing game.

“I don't know we are that way yet,” he said, “to throw the ball that many times (60 attempts in the two games) from a drop-back position.”

Pitt began the season with its five offensive line starters in new positions, including left tackle Adam Bisnowaty, who redshirted last year as a freshman; sophomore center Artie Rowell, whose prior experience was limited to two brief backup appearances; and right tackle T.J. Clemmings, who played defense in his first three seasons.

“(Reporters) started the questions in the beginning of the year,” Hueber said. “The left tackle never played, the right tackle never played, the center never played. The two guards (Cory King and Matt Rotheram) were tackles.

“Some of it caught up to us. Some of it is technique. Some of it is talking to each other (on the field). With the exception of two plays in the (Virginia Tech) game, I wasn't concerned physically. I just thought we made some mistakes that we didn't need to make that gave them an easy play.”

The good news may be that four starters return next year — presumably better equipped to handle a pass rush — four freshmen are in the midst of a redshirt season and another, Dorian Johnson, is backing up Clemmings. Hueber said Johnson is averaging 11 snaps per game, including special teams.

Johnson arrived from Belle Vernon as a five-star recruit and the No. 2 high school tackle in the nation, according to Laremy Tunsil, who was ranked ahead of Johnson, has started three games and played 75 percent of the snaps for Ole Miss, but Hueber said it's difficult for any freshman to win a starting job.

“Do you really think Dorian was in a game with that kind of crowd noise before?” he said of the Virginia Tech game. “And he did a nice job. He certainly wasn't afraid. He certainly didn't have big eyes.

“I think we are moving in the direction where he'll play more.”

Note: A hearing for Pitt defensive tackle Tyrone Ezell, who has been charged with simple assault, harassment and disorderly conduct in connection with a brawl in Homestead on July 30, was postponed until Oct. 30. Ezell has maintained his innocence.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.