Pitt notebook: Offense falls flat when needed most
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — A Pitt team and an offense that looked so productive after piling up 424 yards against Duke last month has fallen on hard times.
When the Panthers needed to control the ball late in a 24-21 loss to Navy on Saturday at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, the offense reached down and couldn't help.
“I think we got a little complacent,” quarterback Tom Savage said.
Judging the offense solely on Savage's numbers, the game didn't look that bad. He completed 20 of 27 passes for 203 yards and two touchdowns, with only one sack and no interceptions for the third consecutive week. That's improvement from the first four games, when he endured a head injury, repeated sacks and six interceptions in the season's first four games.
But Savage bounced around the pocket repeatedly, trying to avoid negative plays while failing to record enough positive ones.
“The last thing you want to do is throw high over their heads over the middle and get (intercepted),” he said. “You can't sit there too long and take sacks. The last thing you want to do is start a drive second-and-15.”
Freshman running back James Conner, who didn't play last week because of a shoulder injury, was not used after losing a fumble in the first half.
“You talk about big plays in the game,” coach Paul Chryst said. “I think that was a big play.”
Navy got its second bit of good fortune when it turned the mistake into a touchdown on the next play.
Despite good coverage from Pitt cornerback K'Waun Williams, Navy senior running back Marcus Thomas caught a deflected pass from quarterback Keenan Reynolds and ran 58 yards for a touchdown. It was Thomas' first career touchdown and second career catch.
Chryst failed to call timeout, even though he had three of them, during Navy's game-winning drive because he didn't want to give the Midshipmen more time to get into field-goal range.
“I was thinking about it,” he said. “In hindsight, maybe you would have or should have. Their kicker had been struggling.”
But the clock kept ticking and Sloan hit the 30-yard field goal with no time left.
Receiver Devin Street became Pitt's all-time leader in career receptions (186) and moved into third place in receiving yards (2,692), but he said the outcome made it “bittersweet.”
“I accomplished what I came here to do,” said Street, a fifth-year senior. “But I want to do a lot more. We still lost.
“We have to clean up the details. There has to be more heart and more fire in it by everyone.”
Street passed Larry Fitzgerald (2,677) and Latef Grim (2,680). Antonio Bryant (3,061) is No. 1, followed by Dietrich Jells (3,003).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.