ShareThis Page

Pitt's preparation for Georgia Tech began on flight after Navy loss

| Friday, Nov. 1, 2013, 10:07 p.m.
Pitt's Devin Street catches a 14-yard pass from Tom Savage before being brought down by Navy's Chris Ferguson in the second quarter Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013, in Annapolis, Md.
Georgia Tech's Jeremiah Attaochu, who has four sacks this season, could cause problems for Pitt this season.

A few hours after Pitt lost to Navy last week — while the sting of defeat was fresh in their minds — players and coaches boarded an airplane for a quiet ride back to Pittsburgh.

Quarterback Tom Savage and coach Paul Chryst didn't want to spend the 60 minutes in the air feeling sorry for themselves. There are five regular-season games left — including a visit to Georgia Tech's Bobby Dodd Stadium on Saturday night — and the flight from Annapolis, Md., seemed like the right time to start preparing.

“The last thing I wanted to do was think about what I did wrong,” Savage said. “You want to watch it.”

So, they reviewed the 24-21 loss.

“It eats at you,” Savage said. “You want to see where I could have went with the ball. I hold myself accountable when stuff doesn't go the right way.”

Besides, he said, “It's pretty cool to be able to sit down with your head coach and watch the game.”

Chryst said the video session wasn't mandatory. It's not something he has done throughout his coaching career.

“There are times where they want to be as far away from me as possible,” he said. “Some guys want to bury it. If you ever did try to make it this-is-what-we-do, that would not work.”

But this was Savage's wish.

“Tom traded his seat to get closer, and I traded my seat to get closer, and we watched it,” Chryst said.

If the Panthers lose to Georgia Tech — they are 10 12 -point underdogs — it won't be for failing to try to make amends.

“It stinks losing,” Savage said. “We can't let Navy beat us twice.”

It might be time for Chryst and Savage to take the cloak off the deep passing game that worked well against Duke five games ago but has disappeared under a blanket of sacks and tougher opponents.

Georgia Tech defends the run well, but its pass defense has allowed 225.2 yards per game. Only four ACC teams are worse.

“We are definitely going to be a little more aggressive this week,” senior wide receiver Devin Street said. “They do play the pass well, but I think we can execute some things.

“It's definitely out there. As long as we are protecting and running good routes, we will be OK.”

Street is motivated by a personal goal that would help Pitt (4-3) finish with a winning record. Last week, he set the school record for career receptions (186) while moving into third in receiving yards (2,692), 369 behind leader Antonio Bryant.

“I'm still not done yet,” Street said.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.