Pitt notebook: Sophomore tight end not a fan of Notre Dame
• Pitt sophomore tight end J.P. Holtz delivered a blow Monday that surely will be heard in South Bend, Ind. Holtz, who scored a touchdown in Pitt's triple-overtime loss last season at Notre Dame Stadium, said playing the Irish gives him extra motivation. “Personally, I don't like Notre Dame at all,” he said. “It's just going to make me go harder. I just think they're really cocky and their coaches are really cocky. I just don't like that. They're just different people there.” Holtz said he took a recruiting visit to Notre Dame while he was a senior at Shaler. “It's awesome up there, but it's not somewhere I would want to go to school,” he said.
• Holtz said losing a close game to Notre Dame, in which Pitt blew a 20-6 lead in the fourth quarter to the then-undefeated Irish, will help this year's Pitt team prepare. “I think it's going to be motivation for a lot of the guys who played last year,” Holtz said. “We should have won that game.”
• Pitt has played Notre Dame every year since 2008 and the five games have been decided by 3, 5, 6, 3 and 3 points. Pitt has lost three in a row in the series, which will resume at Heinz Field in 2015.
• Pitt is expecting 60 high school prospects in attendance Saturday night.
• Offensive tackle Adam Bisnowaty and guard Cory King are recovering from back injuries that kept them out of the starting lineup Saturday. “We're hoping we're over the hump with where (Bisnowaty) is at,” coach Paul Chryst said. “I would anticipate (King) being able to do more this week.”
• Cornerback K'Waun Williams has a bruised biceps, but Chryst said, “I think he'll be all right.”
• Pitt's game against North Carolina on Nov. 16 will kick off at 12:30 p.m. at Heinz Field.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.