Pitt lands Class of 2015 point guard
Damon Wilson calls himself a fundamental point guard. He can use his frame to grab rebounds, push the ball up the floor and dish to teammates in transition.
When Pitt coach Jamie Dixon watched Wilson practice at Our Savior New American in Centereach, N.Y., he saw a player perfectly suited for the Panthers.
Wilson gave a verbal commitment to Pitt on Monday night, shortly after Dixon told that to Wilson in a phone conversation.
“I already liked Pitt. After he came to my practice, he started pushing more,” Wilson said. “He told me he liked the way I play, that my style of play fits Pitt because I can rebound and push it up the floor.”
A 6-foot-5, 193-pound junior, Wilson picked the Panthers over Alabama, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Miami, Stanford, Virginia and Virginia Tech. His father, Damon Sr., played football at Georgia Tech; his older sister, Dominique, plays basketball at N.C. State.
Wilson is Pitt's first commitment from the Class of 2015.
A native of Powder Springs, Ga., Wilson transferred from McEachern High to St. Benedict's Prep in Newark, N.J., last year.
“He's a long, lefty athletic point guard,” Our Savior New American assistant coach Eric Jaklitsch said. “He loves to pass the ball. He's got a team-first attitude and a great will to win. They played him out of position last year. Now, he's got a chance to be a point guard, and he's showing his natural playmaking tendencies.”
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.