Lack of confidence hinders Pitt's Kiesel
Pitt junior point guard Brianna Kiesel has a lot to learn, or at least that what she often says.
It's better than having a player who thinks she knows it all, but heading into the 2013-14 season, Pitt first-year coach Suzie McConnell-Serio wants Kiesel to believe she already knows enough to be successful. After two college seasons without a conference win, Kiesel is long on talent but short on confidence. McConnell-Serio hopes that changes quickly.
Pitt opens its season Friday hosting Bucknell in the fifth annual School Day game.
“The one thing I was surprised with is her lack of confidence at times in herself,” said McConnell-Serio, who replaced Agnus Berenato as Panthers' coach in April. “I don't want her to think that we're not confident in her, because I have a ton of confidence in her out there on the floor as a playmaker and a scorer.”
Kiesel has been a bright spot for the Panthers. A unanimous selection to the Big East All-Freshman Team in 2012, she earned an All-Big East third team nod last season after leading Pitt in virtually every statistical category.
She has led the team in scoring each of the past two seasons, averaged 14.9 points per game as a sophomore and led the conference last season in minutes played (38.8 per game).
“She just wants to win,” McConnell-Serio said. “I think that's what it comes from, because she can play her heart out, and it's very disappointing when you don't win. When you're a part of a team, it doesn't matter what success you have individually. If your team is not successful, then you're not living up to your expectations.”
McConnell-Serio said she wants Kiesel to have the ball in her hands and be the decision maker in late-game situations.
“She's quick, fast with the ball, athletic and she can shoot it,” McConnell-Serio said. “I just need her to believe in herself more.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.