ShareThis Page

Coaches come to grips with new NCAA hand-check rule

| Thursday, Nov. 7, 2013, 10:30 p.m.

The new college basketball rules cracking down on grabby defenders are expected to cause more fouling, at least early. But in the first half of its exhibition game against California (Pa.), officials whistled Robert Morris just three times.

“There were a couple of times I thought we were going to get a foul because of what we had heard when some refs came to practice and things,” Colonials coach Andy Toole said. “That didn't occur. I spoke with the refs after the game and they said it's going to be an adjustment for everybody.”

After a third straight scoring decline resulted in the fewest Division I points since 1952, the NCAA has enforced a longstanding recommendation against using hands and arms while playing defense. Officially outlawed are hand and forearm-checking, placing two hands on an opponent, arm-bars and jabbing.

“They're not judgment calls anymore,” Toole said. “They're absolutes.”

Reaction has been mixed. Louisville coach Rick Pitino enthusiastically told reporters that the new rules are “the biggest change in our game,” adding that “last season was terrible.” Kentucky coach John Calipari in a news conference said the changes “will be good for the game” but wondered about the consistency of the calls month to month.

Others, like Pitt coach Jamie Dixon, surmise that a desired scoring increase might result from more free throws. That would not be fun to watch.

“I don't know if they want 2 12 hour games,” he said. “So something's gotta give.”

But Dixon is willing to give it time.

“I think there's a different mentality,” he said. “There seems to be a more consistent thought process of calling it tighter. So we'll see. But as of now, it's evident. We've seen it in films and we've seen it in our (exhibition) games. We're playing toward that right now, so we'll adjust accordingly.”

Despite videos, clinics and visits by game officials to explain and demonstrate, a general uncertainty prevails. Speaking at the Big 12 media day, Curtis Shaw, the conference men's basketball officials coordinator, described the overall mood as “a lot of angst.”

Toole, however, said the changes reflect what he has been trying to instill in his teams all along.

“I think what people are going to have to do, and what we've been trying to do forever when we teach defense, is be really proactive,” he said. “They're going to have to be well-positioned and they're going to have to have great technique.”

Said Toole: “Because most fouls occur when someone's late, and then someone reaches out and puts a hand there, or they get off-balance because they're not urgent enough and they reach out and grab. Those things are going to be fouls all the time.”

Dixon noted there are so many fouls to give.

“If they call more (fouls) on the outside, they might not call as many inside,” he said. “In our first exhibition game, I thought it was significantly more physical inside, but not on the perimeter. ... There's give and take in everything.”

Duquesne coach Jim Ferry said his players “have to adapt a lot quicker than even us because the game is changing a little bit.”

He added, however, that the changes might help.

“We have the ability to drive the basketball,” Ferry said. “But we've got to play without our hands. ... That's a big philosophy of ours anyway, not fouling. We're going to see if we can do that within these new rules.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.