ShareThis Page

1st-year Syracuse coach Shafer stresses defense with attitude

| Friday, Nov. 22, 2013, 11:18 p.m.

When Scott Shafer was named Syracuse's coach this year, he made a statement any mother — especially if her son plays for Pitt — won't appreciate.

“I envision an orange crush defense that makes the opponents' families cringe when their child is about to get hit,” he said. “We want to put the fear of God in the opposing football player that happens to have the ball underneath his arm.”

Promoted from defensive coordinator when Doug Marrone left Syracuse for the Buffalo Bills, Shafer's aim was to build a defense with a nasty streak, which shouldn't be a problem if players are more like their coach. Earlier in the season, Shafer apologized for shouting obscenities at Clemson coach Dabo Swinney for trying to convert a fourth down with a 35-7 lead.

When told of Shafer's hiring-day declaration, Pitt coach Paul Chryst, whose style runs counter to graphic promises, didn't question Syracuse's defense.

“You can see that mentality as far as they are going to be aggressive,” he said.

Which could mean trouble Saturday at the Carrier Dome where Pitt plays its next-to-last ACC game this season.

Syracuse's style is to blitz furiously — Virginia Tech and Clemson are the only conference teams with more sacks than the Orange's 30 — and Pitt has had almost weekly problems protecting quarterback Tom Savage.

The Panthers (5-5, 2-4) likely will go into the game without starting offensive linemen Adam Bisnowaty and Cory King for the third time in the past four weeks.

Despite Shafer's bravado, Syracuse (5-5, 3-3) has struggled on defense, allowing 265 points, fourth-most in the conference. In losses to Northwestern, Clemson, Georgia Tech and Florida State, Syracuse has surrendered 48, 49, 56 and 59 points.

On offense, Syracuse slowly is adjusting to quarterback Terrel Hunt (6-foot-3, 219 pounds) after three years with Ryan Nassib. Hunt is a good runner (323 yards), but he has thrown only seven touchdown passes — none against a team from a BCS conference.

The game is the first as ACC members for two familiar foes, who have met every year since 1955 and 68 times overall. The only opponents Pitt has played more are Penn State, West Virginia and Notre Dame.

The winner becomes bowl eligible, but Chryst doesn't want that to be the only goal.

“If it was all about the bowl, I would be a little bit nervous because that is putting yourself ahead of it,” he said. “It's Syracuse, and that stands on its own merit.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.