College football notebook: ASU's Graham admits Pitt job was 'mistake'
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Arizona State coach Todd Graham admitted taking the job at Pitt was a “mistake,” according to an SI.com report.
Graham, in his second year at Arizona State, said the timing of his move forced him to tell the Panthers' players by text rather than in person.
“I didn't have any control over the timing,” Graham told SI.com. “I had to resign my job to come here, and had to be on a plane at 8:30 the next morning. I wish I could have been allowed to have the time to (talk to the team).”
Graham said Pitt wasn't right for him.
“I probably made a mistake there. ... It was not a good fit,” he said. “If I had to do it over again, I wouldn't have ever taken the job at Pitt. I'd have stayed at Tulsa and taken the job here at Arizona State.”
• The former U.S. senator brought in to monitor changes at Penn State said it should keep doing what it's been doing, and that a further loosening of NCAA sanctions is possible next year. Athletics integrity monitor George Mitchell briefly addressed university trustees, saying the school needs to maintain the effort it has been demonstrating. Mitchell didn't tell the trustees which other penalties might be reduced.
• Expect Texas A&M quarterback Johnny Manziel to decide before the Aggies' bowl game whether he'll stay in college for another year or declare for the 2014 NFL Draft, his coach said. Texas A&M coach Kevin Sumlin plans to sit down with Manziel and discuss the future after the Aggies' regular-season finale against Missouri on Nov. 30.
• Texas will be without running back Daje Johnson and fullback Chet Moss for its Thanksgiving Day game against Texas Tech due to one-game suspensions, CBSSports.com reported.
• Minnesota's top receiver, Derrick Engel, will miss the rest of the season with a torn ACL, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.