Aaron Donald's second victory on the college football banquet circuit was a little different than the first.
This time, he had a chance to talk to a former winner.
Minutes after Pitt's celebrated defensive tackle was named winner of the Rotary Lombardi Award on Wednesday night in Houston, he spoke via telephone with — and received congratulations from — former Pitt star Hugh Green, the 1980 winner.
Donald, a Panthers senior from Penn Hills, adds the Lombardi (best lineman, offense or defense) to the Bronko Nagurski Award (best defensive player) he won Monday in Charlotte, N.C.
He also was named ACC Defensive Player of the Year twice — once by media members and Wednesday by the conference's head coaches.
The other Lombardi finalists were UCLA's Anthony Barr, Alabama's C.J. Mosley and Missouri's Michael Sam.
“They are great football players,” Donald said after winning the award. “I'm honored just to meet these guys.”
Earlier Wednesday, Donald and the other finalists visited patients at Texas Children's Hospital Cancer Center and MD Anderson Cancer Center.
“It was an amazing opportunity to interact with some of the kids who are less fortunate than you,” he said. “It gives you motivation to see what they are going through.”
Donald's tour continues Thursday at the Home Depot College Football Awards in Lake Buena Vista, Fla., where he is a finalist for the Chuck Bednarik Award (defensive player of the year) and Outland Trophy (most outstanding interior lineman, offense or defense).
Plus, he is a candidate for the Walter Camp All-America team that also will be revealed Thursday. ESPN will televise the presentation, which includes 10 individual awards and the All-America team, starting at 7 p.m.
Donald is not one of the six finalists invited to New York City for the Heisman Trophy ceremony Saturday, but he could be among the top-10 vote getters.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.