Pitt continued to keep the best big men home Wednesday night when coach Paul Chryst received a verbal commitment from four-star Mt. Lebanon offensive lineman Alex Bookser.
The 6-foot-6, 295-pound Bookser plans to enroll next year. He will join Fox Chapel's Adam Bisnowaty, Belle Vernon's Dorian Johnson and Bethel Park's Mike Grimm on the Panthers' offensive line.
Rivals.com and ESPN.com list Bookser as a four-star recruit. Rivals ranked him as the 25th-best offensive tackle in the nation and fourth-best player in state. ESPN.com ranked him as the 14th-best offensive tackle and 149th overall player in the nation and second-best player in the state.
Bookser made official visits to Ohio State, Penn State and Tennessee, according to Rivals.com.
Mt. Lebanon coach Mike Melynk, who confirmed the news, said Bookser is the best offensive linemen he has coached in 26 years.
“No question,” he said. “Alex was a tremendous player for us the past two years. He was a game-changer. Anybody who started game-planning for us had to figure out what they were going to do with him. He played 48 minutes on both sides of the ball (including defensive tackle).”
Bookser is the 21st member of the Class of 2014 and the third four-star prospect to commit to Pitt. The other top-rated players, according to Rivals.com rankings, are Grimm and running back Chris James of Illinois.
Four-stars Montae Nicholson of Gateway and Shai McKenzie of Washington list Pitt among their final choices and will announce their plans Thursday and Friday.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.